Tax Neutrality – Goodwill Savannah GA Wed, 29 Jun 2022 20:26:52 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Tax Neutrality – Goodwill Savannah GA 32 32 5 things to look for when a wine claims to be “sustainable” Wed, 29 Jun 2022 18:51:31 +0000

It’s a word consumers hear all the time: sustainable. The concept contains an element of responsibility and commitment – to the environment, to the community, to the people at work. When people hear the word sustainability they think of efforts to do more good than harm and keep it that way.

But in the wine industry, the word can stand for anything from lip service to demonstrated action. Terms like organic and biodynamic are defined and are often the standard bearers of ecological responsibility. But some solid vineyards choose not to certify. Others may be in conversion. Others go beyond and find these labels less powerful. Some wineries lose their certification after a particularly difficult season, but remain faithful to values ​​considered environmental and social standards. Just because a wine or a winery isn’t organic or biodynamic on paper doesn’t mean it’s useless.

How to say? Here are five safeguarding factors that will help identify the behaviors behind the wine brand and facilitate an informed buying decision.

Is sustainable development defined?

Some wine regions have integrated the term sustainable in the official name or stamps of certification bodies. For example, Sustainable Austria was developed by the Association of Austrian Winegrowers to allow producers to self-certify on several factors, including climate neutrality, water and energy use, biodiversity, social norms, etc. If a product bears the logo (shown above), consumers can rest assured that the producer has met the steps to achieve it. In this case, the term sustainable was defined by several points.

This may also apply to individual growers. Jean-Baptiste Cordonnier and Nathalie Coipel Cordonnier are the owners of Château Anthionic in Bordeaux, where the grapes are grown organically. But the estate goes further than that, defining what is done not only for the production of the vine, but also to improve the area around the chateau with agroforestry, the planting of trees in and near the vines to reduce the impact of climate change and provide refuge. for wildlife. These are acts that, for now, are not defined by any official certification or stamp, but the winery itself defines and communicates these efforts to help consumers understand that the wine they buy reflects the values ​​of the biodiversity.

Does the winery do anything for its neighbours?

Taking a step back, one could argue that a company that is content to support itself could potentially do so at the expense of other stakeholders. Many of today’s most responsible wineries not only take care of their own land, people and resources, but also help causes or contribute to the community.

Symington Wine Estates is by no means a small business. As one of the most important wine producers in Portugal and in the world, this B Corp organization uses its influence to have a positive impact on the community and the wine industry as a whole. The organization has a clearly stated plan and was one of the first to join the International Wineries for Climate Action group. Not only the brand sustainablethey have a much greater impact that goes beyond the expressions of viticulture and winemaking.

But this type of business is not limited to wineries with a global footprint. Brooks Winery is one of Oregon’s most respected producers, and for good reason. Run by Janie Brooks Heuck, this family business donates 1% of its annual revenue to support Kiss the Ground, has planted 40,000 trees, is a B Corp and is certified biodynamic by Demeter.

Is there a greater presence in the game?

Sometimes a winery will need to demonstrate social or environmental responsibility before identifying itself as part of a larger entity. Each château in the Crus Bourgeois du Médoc classification, for example, must have obtained High Environmental Value certification. This is codified by the French government, ensuring that a property meets four elements: biodiversity conservation, plant protection strategy, fertilizer use management and water management.

LODI RULES is considered one of the strongest certifications focused on sustainability. It is exceptionally rigorous, self-defined by the organization as: “In agriculture, sustainability means farming that is environmentally and socially responsible while being economically viable.” Producers here pay a self-imposed grape tax to fund the Lodi Winegrape Commission’s research and educational efforts. What began as a grassroots initiative by a group of family farmers has grown into more than 1,200 certified vineyards in California, Washington and even Israel.

Does the organization have a trustworthy leader?

When a wine is associated with a leader who will put their own face, family and reputation on the line, it’s a good indicator that the product has a social and ecological ethos that would make most people proud.

An icon is Dr. Laura Catena, a fourth-generation Argentinian physician and winemaker at one of South America’s most respected wineries, Catena Zapata. She is also the author of Vino Argentino: An Insider’s Guide to Argentina’s Wines and Wine Region and co-author of Malbec Mon Amour. Within the wine industry, Catena is so respected that she is considered one of the most competent voices for communicating the rich history and relevant presence of wines not just from her estate, but from Argentina in his outfit. His father and winery owner, Nicolás Catena Zapata is also highly respected and a recipient of Passionate about wineLifetime Achievement Award.

Another example is Gérard Bertrand, head of a group of wine estates in the Languedoc region of France. He is a public voice on climate change, speaking from his biodynamic platform, the method at work in each of his vineyards. Bertrand participates in the Good Planet Foundation and in the Objective 10,000 Trees agroforestry project. Balancing the ecosystem and reducing the organization’s carbon footprint are objectives inherent in all the wines produced by Bertrand and his team.

One of the biggest complaints within the wine industry today is the lack of informative labeling, especially for ingredients and processing. It can be difficult to tell if a wine matches its values ​​just by looking at the label, even when the producer strives to display as much useful information as possible. On the one hand, people want to pop and pour their wines with ease, but on the other hand, many wine lovers appreciate the opportunity to research and read about the wines they buy. The second camp, consumers who are willing to look beyond buzzwords, will benefit from asking what a brand means when it says sustainable. Often a quick internet search will reveal answers.


WASHINGTON, June 24, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — More than 70 U.S. workers employed in the U.S. forest products industry have descended washington d.c., this week and conducted about 365 visits with members of Congress. Their objective: to make elected officials aware of the impact of legislative and regulatory decisions on the environment, as well as families and communities who depend on the production of forest products for their livelihood.

The Pulp and Paperworkers’ Resource Council (PPRC) is a grassroots organization run by hourly employees who advocate for the US forest products industry. We support policies that encourage economic growth, an abundant and sustainable fiber supply, and sound science-based environmental policies. (PRNewsfoto/PPRC)

The Pulp & Paperworkers’ Resource Council (PPRC) worker group, a grassroots organization of hourly workers in the forest products industry, is passionate about educating members of Congress and administrative officials in the ‘U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Management and Budget, and other government agencies on issues affecting U.S. manufacturing jobs in their industry. They represented 50 factories in 21 states.

“Our 30e Anniversary Fly-in provides the PPRC with a wonderful opportunity to meet with congressional and administration leaders on environmental issues impacting our industry – especially on topics such as biomass carbon neutrality, paper recycling and forest management,” said PPRC President David Wise. “The importance of clear and sensible regulatory legislation and policy cannot be underestimated, as this foundation is essential to support the continued growth of manufacturing jobs in rural and urban communities and ensure a playing field competitive for the U.S. forest products industry in the global marketplace.”

The PPRC specifically discussed several issues with members of Congress, including:

  • Improving the Health of Federal Forests – The PPRC supports measures to better manage our forests to increase resilience and growth in the face of fires, hurricanes, diseases, insects and natural disasters. The PPRC would support legislation to help fund fire suppression, forest inventory and sustainable forest management.

  • Reform of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) – The protection of truly endangered species is in the public interest. The impact on people, property and jobs must be assessed when developing regulations. The ESA should be modernized and updated with Congressional oversight of the social and economic costs of an ESA listing. Any list must be based on objective, verifiable science with flexibility giving states and local governments a greater role in ESA decisions.

  • Paper recycling is an environmental success story – Highly recycled paper products should not be included in federal Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) legislation. The recycling rate for paper in the United States was 68% in 2021. The recycling rate for old corrugated packaging (OCC) was 91.4%. According to the EPA, by weight, more paper is recovered for recycling from municipal solid waste streams than metals, plastics and glass combined.

  • Improving Sustainable Manufacturing in the United States and Addressing the Regulatory Burden – The PPRC recommends that the EPA consider the cumulative impact of future regulations with the goal of achieving sustainable regulations that meet economic and environmental needs and social expectations. This will allow the US forest products industry to continue to be an American success story. Upcoming regulations cover air emissions, beneficial use of mill residues, water effluents, carbon and greenhouse gases, among others.

PPRC members also thanked members of Congress who joined the Paper and Packaging Caucus, and members who attended the Caucus Congress reception on June 21st.

The PPRC is a grassroots labor organization run by hourly workers who defend the US forest products industry. We support policies that encourage economic growth, an abundant and sustainable fiber supply, and sound science-based environmental policies. The US forest products industry is vitally important to our nation’s economy, employing approximately 950,000 people. We rank among the top 10 manufacturers in 45 states and represent 4% of total US manufacturing GDP. We are people dedicated to environmental conservation while considering the economic stability of the workforce and the surrounding community.


Representing members of: USW, IAM, IBEW, IBT, UBC, fire and oil tankers and forest products industry workers. For more information and to view the 2022 PPRC position papers, please visit

Forest Products Workers Commemorate the 30th Anniversary of the Pulp and Paper Workers Resource Council

Forest Products Workers Commemorate the 30th Anniversary of the Pulp and Paper Workers Resource Council



View original content to download multimedia: -environment-by-commemorating-the-30th-anniversary-of-the-pulp-and-paper-workers-resource-council-301574922.html

SOURCE The Pulp and Paper Workers Resource Council

Prioritize sweeping clean energy legislation – pv magazine USA Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:19:53 +0000

Passing the Build Back Better climate jobs and clean energy provisions is our best chance of achieving the necessary reductions and averting climate catastrophe; we just can’t wait any longer.

With each passing day, the planet is warming and the window to advance urgent climate legislation is shrinking. As the United States celebrates independence in July, we can also establish ourselves as a global leader in the fight against the climate crisis – the ultimate act of patriotism and duty to country.

After more than a year of missed opportunities, this summer ushered in a watershed opportunity for the US Senate to pass the Build Back Better Act’s $555 billion climate jobs and clean energy package. passed by the House. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer must put climate at the top of the agenda and work to pass a fiscal reconciliation package by Independence Day as Democrats hold always the majority.

The climate and jobs package would put the country on track to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 50% below peak levels by 2030, which is about the pace that scientists say the whole world must follow to prevent the Earth from warming more than 2.7 F. Experts warn that beyond this threshold, the threat of catastrophic weather events will increase enormously.

Passing the Build Back Better climate jobs and clean energy provisions is our best chance of achieving the necessary reductions and averting climate catastrophe; we just can’t wait any longer. If Democrats lose control of Congress after midterm elections this fall, hopes for meaningful climate action at the federal level will be dashed. Conversely, if the Senate follows the House’s lead and sends this legislation to the President’s office, it would mark the largest federal investment ever in clean energy and usher in a new era for our nation’s energy system. .

Americans want to see this action. A Pew Center poll in January found that 69% of Americans favor federal action toward carbon neutrality by 2050. The climate package would have far-reaching impacts beyond reducing 5.2 billion tons of carbon. greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. It would spur inherently deflationary clean energy projects, help strengthen energy security and national security, create millions of jobs, improve community health and reduce energy expenditure of $67 billion per year, saving US households $300 per year.

The bulk of the funding – around $320 billion – would go towards providing tax credits for installing residential and commercial solar power, retrofitting buildings to be more energy efficient and the purchase of electric vehicles. These provisions alone would mark the largest climate investment in our country’s history, setting the course to achieve our goals of reducing greenhouse gas emissions while creating millions of well-paying jobs, reducing energy costs to consumers, advancing environmental justice, investing in climate-resilient housing and community infrastructure, and strengthening our economy.

As Americans face historically high prices at the gas pump, it’s also critical that we advance our nation’s energy independence and reduce our reliance on foreign oil. The Biden administration has already demonstrated its commitment to bolstering our domestic clean energy industry by invoking the Defense Production Act (DPA) to boost the manufacturing of solar technology on American soil. Build Back Better would build on that momentum, doing even more to kick-start domestic manufacturing of clean energy equipment, including wind turbines and solar panels.

The key to building back better is the protection and inclusion of low-income and historically disadvantaged communities. The bill would implement a 30% tax credit on solar project costs, plus an additional 10% to 20% tax credit for renewable energy systems located in or serving low-income communities. revenue. Basically, the solar tax credit would be made refundable or paid directly allowing everyone, including non-taxable entities like cities, nonprofits, tribes, and schools, regardless of their federal income tax, to access the tax credit. These provisions allow more Americans to experience the benefits of clean energy directly.

The overwhelming positive response to President Biden’s DPA announcement from the American people, the energy industry, environmental advocates, business leaders and the stock market last week clearly indicates that the future is in clean energy. If Majority Leader Schumer can pass this transformative legislation by July 4, he will secure his place in history at this pivotal moment for the United States of America. It’s the patriotic thing to do.

U.S. Army veteran Kevin Johnson is co-founder of CleanCapital, board director of the Environmental Defense Action Fund and American Resilience Project .

Odette Mucha is Federal Liaison Officer at Vote Solar and former White House and US Department of Energy analyst.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of photo magazine.

This content is copyrighted and may not be reused. If you wish to cooperate with us and wish to reuse some of our content, please contact:

SoftBank eyes additional London listing for Arm’s IPO Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:30:00 +0000

SoftBank considered listing Arm in New York, but the UK government is continuing efforts to get the company to list the semiconductor maker in London.

From Nvidia [NVDA] dropped plans to acquire Arm after coming under pressure from UK and European regulators, chip designer owner SoftBank [9984.TYO]pondered the IPO in New York.

“We think the Nasdaq … which is at the center of global high technology, would be the most appropriate,” SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son said in February.

Son’s plan sent British ministers on a charm offensive to convince the Japanese conglomerate to consider a secondary listing in London. The government is keen to promote the capital as an attractive place for high-growth businesses to set up shop and set up shop.

London tech IPOs raised a total of £6.6bn last year, more than double the £3.1bn raised in 2020. They included the cybersecurity company based on Darktrace artificial intelligence [DARK.L]which debuted in April with a valuation of £1.7 billion, and the Oxford Nanopore biotech [ONT.L], which debuted in September at a valuation of around £2.5 billion. Others include Deliveroo [ROO.L]moon pig [MOON.L] and TrustPilot [TRST.L].

“Efforts have been made to make the London market a hub for technology companies, a sector that is severely underrepresented at present,” commented AJ Bell’s chief investment officer, Russ Mould. “A return of Arm, after delisting necessitated by the group’s 2016 acquisition by Japan’s SoftBank, would be a small step in the right direction,” Mold added.

Son said he plans to sell part of the company’s stake in Arm by the end of the fiscal year in March 2023.

Questions remain

Hargreaves Lansdown’s senior investment and market analyst Susannah Streeter isn’t convinced the charm offensive is working. If the UK fails to persuade local tech companies to sign up here, “it will be a blow to London’s ambitions and it will put pressure on the government to speed up reform”, she said. . Reuters.

Even if London were to secure a secondary listing for Arm, the placement would come with limitations, namely that the chip designer would be excluded from the FTSE 100 index.

There have even been question marks over whether SoftBank should pursue an IPO. The hope was that the sale to Nvidia would raise funds.

Kirk Boodry, technical analyst at Tokyo-based Redex Holdings, told the FinancialTimes in February that the “big question” was “whether SoftBank can reveal the value it hoped to receive from Nvidia” via an IPO.

SoftBank Group owns 75% of Arm, while its Vision Fund owns the other quarter. Falling valuations of tech investments led the Vision Fund to post its biggest ever annual loss of 3.5 trillion yen over the 12 months to the end of March. Overall, the tech conglomerate posted a record loss of 1.7 trillion yen for the financial year.

Importance of industry

Assuming the IPO goes as planned, it is believed that Son will be targeting a $60 billion valuation. “That might sound a bit rich for a company with current annual revenues of just $2.5 billion, but it’s hard to overstate the importance of Arm technology to the semiconductor industry. “said Mike Orme, thematic research analyst at GlobalData.

It was reported in late May that Qualcomm [QCOM] would be keen to acquire a stake in any upcoming IPO as part of a semiconductor consortium.

Qualcomm CEO Cristiano Amon told the FinancialTimes that it would work to maintain Arm’s neutrality. This is the key. Nvidia’s collapsed deal has come under scrutiny over fears it would ‘damage the competitiveness of Nvidia’s rivals by restricting access to Arm’s intellectual property’, according to the UK government .

“This could be the most important event in the semiconductor industry since Intel [INTC]TSMC [TSM]and Samsung [005930.KS] took strategic stakes in ASML [ASML] in 2012 to allow it to bring an extreme ultraviolet chip-making machine to market,” Orme commented.

“As a result, ASML has become the only company able to offer the means to manufacture new generations of the most advanced chips. We are in similar territory here.

The semiconductor sector has underperformed the broader market since the start of the year. The S&P Semiconductors Select Industry Index is showing a negative return of 36.7% through the June 17 close. The S&P 500 has a negative return of 22.9%.

Disclaimer Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

CMC Markets is an execution-only service provider. The material (whether or not expressing opinions) is provided for informational purposes only and does not take into account your personal circumstances or objectives. Nothing in this document is (or should be considered to be) financial, investment or other advice on which reliance should be placed. No opinion given in the material constitutes a recommendation by CMC Markets or the author that any particular investment, security, transaction or investment strategy is suitable for any specific person.

The material has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research. Although we are not specifically restricted from processing prior to providing such material, we do not seek to take advantage of the material prior to its dissemination.

CMC Markets does not endorse or offer an opinion on the trading strategies used by the author. Their trading strategies do not guarantee any return and CMC Markets will not be liable for any loss you may incur, directly or indirectly, as a result of any investment based on the information contained herein.

*Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may change or differ in a jurisdiction other than the UK.

Keep reading for FREE

Our challenge is to honor and preserve Olmsted’s legacy Sun, 19 Jun 2022 06:30:46 +0000

Advocacy needed for Public Lands Preservation Act

With the pandemic, climate crisis and deepening political divisions, we have never needed our parks and forests more for respite, carbon capture and storage and common ground, as we are reminded. Malcolm Gay’s story of the legacy of Frederick Law Olmsted (“A Green Gem Burnished Again,” page A1, June 12). Development pressures threaten these sanctuaries, and we have an immediate opportunity to protect these lands more permanently.

The Public Lands Preservation Act prevents the sale of these lands without providing a substitute of equal value in terms of size, value, location and natural resources. For the state to reach its goal of carbon neutrality by 2050, we must preserve these lands. Their value as a balm for contemporary ills is evident from the substantial increase in resident visits since the start of the pandemic.

Unfortunately, the Senate version omits this protection and allows the sale of these lands, undermining the purpose of the PLPA. Massachusetts residents should inform Senate Speaker Karen Spilka and their elected Senator and Representative of the Legislative Assembly that the state must adopt H.852, which protects our intact natural heritage.

Karl Dziura

Tracey Noble


Lawmakers Should Take Steps To Polish Emerald Necklace, Other Areas

Regarding “Maps: What Boston Could Have Looked Like Had Olmsted’s Original Plans Had Been Realized” (, June 12): Egalitarian public green space is the living legacy of Frederick Law Olmsted’s vision for the boston emerald necklace. But much of his work has been eroded or never fully realized.

Currently three Bills are before the Legislative Assembly that would provide funding and policies to protect, expand and restore the Emerald Necklace and lands and waters across the Commonwealth.

The Public Lands Protection Act would require that developments on protected public lands be replaced with lands of equivalent environmental and community value.

Significant portions of the original Emerald Necklace have disappeared or been defaced due to public works projects, including Wood Island Park in East Boston, the Charlesgate Corridor in Fenway, and the Shattuck Hospital Complex in Franklin Park.

A second option would be to amend the Economic Development Bill to allocate strong funding from the American Recovery Plan Act and other sources to support the acquisition and restoration of ecologically valuable land.

A third bill would increase the cap on the conservation land tax incentive program, which allows private landowners to donate conservation land and save funds for the state.

We urge residents to reach out to lawmakers to urge action before this session closes in late July.

Steve Long

Director of Policy and Partnerships, Massachusetts

Nature conservation


Invest in cleaning up the Muddy River

Thank you for Malcolm Gay’s wonderful front-page story on the 200th anniversary of Frederick Law Olmsted’s birth and his incredible legacy with the Emerald Necklace. As the article noted, however, the job is not done. Not only are some areas of the Emerald Necklace bisected by noise, pollution and car traffic, which Olmsted never anticipated or designed, but the River Muddy, which he reshaped in order to reduce floods and fight against waste water discharges, is the most polluted. tributary of the Charles River. In 2020, our organization rated it a D minus for E. coli, cyanobacteria, and combined sewer overflows. Truly realizing the potential of Olmsted’s vision for this urban park oasis must include making the necessary investments to clean up the Muddy River.

Emily Norton

Executive Director

Charles River Watershed Association


As coal mines close, miners in Silesia face an uncertain future Fri, 17 Jun 2022 04:00:00 +0000

In Silesia, Poland, the largest mining region in Europe, mine closures are looming. The European Green Deal aims to reduce CO2 emissions by 55% by 2030 and achieve climate neutrality by 2050. But for this energy transition to be just, the decarbonisation process must guarantee the rights and means of subsistence of the workers concerned. In Poland, this transformation raises both hopes and fears, and while miners understand the need for change, they also fear for their future and that of their region.

Poland has closed two-thirds of its mines in the past 30 years, reducing the number of jobs in the sector from 300,000 to 80,000, according to miners’ unions. The impact of these closures has been uneven. While Katowice, the capital of the “voivodship” or Silesian province, is undergoing new development, social conflicts and pockets of poverty have arisen in many other towns where mining was previously the main source of income. The closures also appear to have had little impact on greenhouse gas emissions, leaving many miners to wonder to what extent simply closing mines can solve the problem without a fundamental change in Poland’s energy model.

Along with the mine, the Laziska Steelworks is the main employer in and around the municipality of Laziska.

Photo: Hanna Jarzabek

The Polish economy is highly dependent on the metallurgical industry, 74% of whose energy comes from coal (domestic and imported) while only 15% comes from renewable energies. Under these conditions, achieving the EU’s 2030 targets will not be an easy task. And while many in Poland understand that change is needed – the country has 36 of Europe’s 50 most smog-polluted cities, including 12 in Silesia – the question of how exactly to bring about this change has many scratching their heads.

A reading of history shows that the miners’ fears are well-founded: “Since 1989, no one has managed to restructure a mine,” says Andrzej Chwiluk, president of the Polish Miners’ Union (KWK) at the Makoszowy mine in Zabrze. Equal times. “The decision to close our mine was made within a week. Nobody said, ‘Get ready guys, because in a year or two we’re going to close. No, they just gave us a dismissal certificate and that was it. It made no economic sense. We had one of the most modern mine shafts and even won the safest mine award,” he says. When the Makoszowy mine was selected for closure in 2016, it employed 1,700 workers. Of these, 500 remained to maintain and secure the wells, administratively manage land and employees. This number will be reduced to 80 by 2023, the final closing date.

The Makoszowy mine in Zabrze ceased mining activities in 2016. Since then it has been in the process of being closed, with completion scheduled for 2023. Currently, 200 people work there.

Photo: Hanna Jarzabek

“It can take up to seven years to close a mine, like ours. During this time, not a single new job has been created here,” says Chwiluk. “We still have 200 employees. Women are in the most difficult situation. After 37 years of work, unable to retire, they are offered jobs as cleaners or supervisors at a service station. An accountant, who has spent her whole life in the office, monitors gas pumps on the outskirts of town, in the middle of nowhere and even has to work nights. It is not always possible to get there by public transport and most of them do not have a car or a driver’s license, not to mention the money to pay for it. And it is unlikely that their salaries will be maintained. It looks like the same story will repeat itself in the mines that are now closing.

Andrzej Chwiluk, president of the Polish miners’ union KWK Makoszowy, with his grandson.

Photo: Hanna Jarzabek

In May 2021, after tense negotiations, miners’ unions signed a social agreement with the government on the transformation of the coal mining sector, which provides for the continuation of operations at individual mines until 2049. The document establishes a phased closure schedule and a benefits package for miners, including one-time severance packages. However, its implementation depends on the notification procedure of the European Commission and a favorable opinion is not guaranteed. Although the request was sent at the end of February, the status of the negotiations is still unknown. One of the possible reasons for this delay is the armed conflict in Ukraine, which has seriously undermined EU energy policy.

The year 2049 could prove to be too late a date for the European Union. Additionally, the deal provides for two mechanisms that could jeopardize the provision of funds for transformation – public allocations to the sector and investments for the construction and launch of what the pact defines as “clean coal facilities”, which are used for coal gasification. for synthetic natural gas, among others.

Miners of the Piast mine in Bieruń, Silesia, working 650 meters underground. The mine is expected to close in 2035.

Photo: Hanna Jarzabek

“The agreement gives us the guarantee that no one will lose their job and that the closure will be gradual,” explains Jerzy Demski, president of the workers’ union at the bottom of the Piast mine in Bieruń. “In 2017, the government told us that Poland needed coal, millions of investments in machinery, training and even scholarships to attract students. Barely three years later, they wanted to shut us down, practically overnight. Now we know we have almost 30 years to plan everything. But we have to start acting, because time is running out and nothing has been done since the agreement was signed.

According to the schedule, the Sośnica mine in Gliwice will stop extracting coal in 2029. The mine currently employs 1,800 people, 800 of whom will stay by 2029 to ensure the closure process. “Some of the remaining 1,000 people will retire, but for the rest it’s a problem,” says Paweł Klucewicz, 37, president of the KONTRA Miners’ Union at the Sośnica mine. “Now management is looking for excuses to fire people. It happened with a miner who had an accident at work and was then fired at the end of his sick leave. Management claimed he was absent too long. And those who are made redundant now will not receive severance pay. Only those who leave after the closure in 2029 will receive it.”

Paweł Klucewicz (left), president of the KONTRA miners’ union, and Mirosław Wilk (right), member of the Sośnica (Gliwice) mine union, pose in their official miners’ uniforms. Both have worked in the mine for over 13 years.

Photo: Hanna Jarzabek

“I understand. We have to give up coal, no problem,” adds Mirosław Wilk, member of the KONTRA union at the Sośnica mine. “But give us something back! Nothing new is opening up here! Wilk has worked underground for 13 years. He shares a 46 square meter apartment with his wife, who works in the processing plant of the same mine, and his two children. His accommodations are a far cry from the myth of the rich miner. 120,000 zlotys [approximately €25,600 or US$26,800] severance pay is enough for me to live for a year. I am 44 years old and have spent most of my professional life in the mining sector. Who’s gonna give me a job now? The special economic zone we have here [in Katowice]how many workers can it really absorb?

Panoramic view of Katowice, the capital of the province of Silesia.

Photo: Hanna Jarzabek

Companies in SEZ Katowice, a special economic zone, enjoy preferential conditions such as tax exemptions. It was created in 1996 with the aim of supporting restructuring processes and creating new jobs in the region. Since then, the special economic zone has created 90,000 jobs. The mining industry currently employs 80,000 people and, according to the unions, one job in the mine generates four jobs in related sectors.

“There are no unions in the private sector either, no collective agreements, no benefits, nothing,” says Chwiluk. “Most of these contracts are garbage; they are for a short period of time with no guarantee of extension. When they decided to close our mine, we came up with ideas on how to use the mine land and infrastructure to create jobs. We proposed a waste incineration plant, a hydroelectric plant using mine water, solar farms on unusable coal heaps, a car depot in a mine siding, even bottling and the sale of fresh water from the mine. All of these things would employ about a thousand people, but no one took these projects seriously. It turns out that Greta Thunberg came to see us. It was while discussing with her and with the NGOs that I finally had the feeling that someone was listening to us.

Participation in decision-making processes is one of the cornerstones of just transition, but in Poland it is only just beginning to be discussed. “All parties need to come to the table and develop a more holistic view of the whole process, which puts workers and the local community at the centre. It hasn’t been done so far, but I want to believe that this time there is more hope,” says Patryk Białas, city councilor and member of the Katowice City Mining Commission.

The Guido Museum in Zabrze, built in an old mine, is the largest underground complex in Europe, with 10 kilometers of pathways to explore. It now employs around a hundred former miners. Roman Chytry, a retired miner, is now a museum guide.

Photo: Hanna Jarzabek

Retraining, another pillar of the just transition, has not been easy either. Classes are rarely held, and when they are, they teach skills like languages, hairdressing, and even floristry. “The union would be happy to help organize refresher courses, because we know what companies need, but everything is decided at EU level. Nobody consulted us on the subject and I have yet to see a project that would really increase the qualifications of the workers,” says Marek Klucewicz, chairman of the national committee of the KONTRA miners’ union.

According to information provided by Sławomir Gruszka, spokesperson for the office of the President of the Silesian Voivodeship, the province developed the energy project in cooperation with the special economic zone of Katowice, with the aim of improving the skills of workers and increase employment. The project targets 310 people, including miners and workers in mining-related companies who are at risk of being made redundant. Scheduled to begin on December 1, 2021, registration for the program has yet to begin.

The Ziemowit mine in Ledziny, Silesia, is scheduled to close in 2037.

Photo: Hanna Jarzabek

“We need training and support to create jobs, but I think we also have to consider modernization and new technologies,” says Klucewicz. “We must reduce the amount of greenhouse gases while ensuring the country’s energy independence. Given what is happening in Ukraine, we may have to reconsider.

Huawei and Informa Tech Hosted the Africa Green ICT 2022 Webinar to Light Up a Sustainable Africa Wed, 15 Jun 2022 14:46:00 +0000

As the world works towards carbon neutrality, many African countries have accelerated the energy transition by integrating renewable energy targets into their national energy plans and adopting innovative energy solutions. ICT innovation plays a key role in green growth by Africa.

As a leader in ICT innovations, Huawei focuses on three areas to drive green development: building green ICT infrastructure, increasing the proportion of renewable energy in power generation, and building industries. green.

Alvin GongPresident of Huawei Northern African Digital Power Business, said in his speech, “In the ICT industry, Huawei has had successful experiences in North Africa during the last years. We have built systematic 3-level solutions for better energy efficiency, including green site, green network and green operation. These solutions contribute to achieving the goals of green ICT.”

Thecla Mbongue, senior research analyst at Omdia, delved into green ICT development from an African perspective. “In Africa, limited access to electricity makes the use of green ICTs a necessity rather than just an initiative to achieve zero carbon emissions,” she said during the webinar.

Atef Marzouk, senior energy consultant at Huawei Northern Africa Digital Power Business, shared his thoughts on how green energy policies are supporting the continent’s green transition. He pointed out that renewable energy policies are the catalyst for accelerated market transformation. “Fiscal and financial policies are essential to increase the deployment of renewable energy (RE). It is important that the government sets its target and develops RE by reducing taxes and the like,” Atef said.

Abdullah Al-Shammas, CEO of IHS Cameroon, analyzed the challenges faced by the ICT industry in improving energy efficiency and shared information on industry trends and good practices in green development for tower companies. He stressed that governments, carriers, service providers and tower companies should work together to promote the sustainable development of the telecommunications industry and bring good to the public.

Seif SedkyCEO of Europe & MEA of Green Power Technologie, said: “With accelerating global warming, it is essential to act quickly to achieve carbon neutrality. Green Power Technology’s mission is to leverage its expertise and knowledge of the African market to develop a powerful ecosystem of partners who can effectively deploy, operate and manage Huawei’s smart and powerful PV solutions.”

Together with customers and partners, Huawei will continuously innovate, use green ICT to drive green development, use bits to manage watts, and drive green growth in Africa.

Photo –


Why the Internet Needs Crawl Neutrality Fri, 10 Jun 2022 04:00:52 +0000

Today, a single company, Google, controls nearly all of the world’s access to information on the Internet. Their monopoly in search means for billions of people, their gateway to knowledge, to products, and to their exploration of the Web is in the hands of a single company. Most agree that this lack of competition in research is bad for individuals, communities and democracy.

Unbeknownst to many, one of the biggest barriers to competition in search is the lack of exploration neutrality. The only way to build an independent search engine and have the ability to fairly compete with Big Tech is to first crawl the internet effectively and efficiently. However, the web is an actively hostile environment for beginner search engine crawlers, with most websites only allowing Google’s crawler and discriminating against other search engine crawlers like that of Neeva.

This critically important, yet often overlooked, issue has a huge impact on preventing emerging search engines like Neeva from providing users with genuine alternatives, further reducing competition in search. Similar to net neutrality, today we need an approach to crawl neutrality. Without a change in policy and behavior, search competitors will continue to fight with one hand tied behind their backs.

Let’s start at the beginning. Building a comprehensive web index is a prerequisite for competition in search. In other words, the first step in building the Neeva search engine is to “download the Internet” through Neeva’s crawler, called Neevabot.

This is where the trouble begins. For the most part, websites only allow unfettered access to Google and Bing crawlers while discriminating against other crawlers like Neeva’s. These sites disallow everything else in their robots.txt files or (more commonly) say nothing in robots.txt, but return errors instead of content to other crawlers. The intention may be to screen out malicious actors, but the consequence is to throw the baby out with the bathwater. And you can’t provide search results if you can’t crawl the web.

This forces startups to spend an inordinate amount of time and resources finding workarounds. For example, Neeva implements a policy of “crawling a site as long as the robots.txt file allows GoogleBot and does not specifically prohibit Neevabot”. Even after a workaround like this, parts of the web with useful search results remain inaccessible to many search engines.

As a second example, many websites often allow a non-Google crawler via robots.txt and block it in other ways, either by throwing various types of errors (503, 429, …) or by limiting the debit. Crawling these sites requires deploying workarounds such as “obfuscate by crawling using a bank of proxy IP addresses that rotate periodically”. Legit search engines like Neeva are loath to deploy conflicting workarounds like this.

These roadblocks are often aimed at malicious bots, but have the effect of stifling legitimate search competition. We at Neeva have put a lot of effort into creating a crawler that respects bitrate limits and crawls at the minimum bitrate necessary to create a great search engine. In the meantime, Google has carte blanche. It crawls 50B web pages per day. It visits every page on the web once every three days and taxes network bandwidth on all websites. It is the tax of the Internet monopolist.

For the lucky bots among us, a bunch of well-meaning supporters, webmasters, and editors can help you whitelist your bot. Thanks to them, Neeva’s crawling now runs at hundreds of millions of pages per day, on track to soon reach billions of pages per day. Even so, it still requires identifying the right people at those companies that you can talk to, emailing and cold calling, and hoping for goodwill from webmasters on webmaster aliases that are generally ignored. An interim fix that is not upgradable.

Getting permission to explore shouldn’t depend on who you know. There should be a level playing field for everyone who participates and plays by the rules. Google is a search monopoly. Websites and webmasters face an impossible choice. Let Google crawl them or they won’t appear prominently in Google results. As a result, Google’s search monopoly causes the Internet as a whole to reinforce the monopoly by giving preferential access to Googlebot.

The internet should not be allowed to distinguish between search engine robots based on who they are. Neeva’s crawler is able to crawl the web at the speed and depth of Google. There are no technical limits, just anti-competitive market forces that make fair competition more difficult. And if it’s too much extra work for webmasters to distinguish bad bots slowing down their websites from legitimate search engines, then those with carte blanche like GoogleBot should be required to share their data with responsible actors.

Regulators and policymakers must step in if they care about competition in research. The market needs crawl neutrality, similar to net neutrality.

Vivek Raghunathan is co-founder of Neeva, a private ad-free search engine. Asim Shankar is Neeva’s Chief Technology Officer.

Cabral on Jail Calls Amendment, Budget Wins for New Bedford Wed, 08 Jun 2022 04:47:07 +0000

One of the most discussed issues during this year’s budget debate in Beacon Hill was how the Legislature would respond to the recent Supreme Court Judicial decision that reaffirmed the ability of county sheriff’s departments to generate income by collecting charges for prison appeals.

This authority, though granted by state law and celebrated by Bristol County Sheriff Tom Hodgson as a “victory for the ratepayers”, is seen by many state Democrats as a moral wrong. which only exacerbates the problems of inequality in the justice system.

State Rep. Tony Cabral (D – New Bedford), who served as a counterweight to Sheriff Hodgson’s notions of correctional justice, recently joined me on the air to discuss, among other things, an amendment passed by the State House that will end the practice of charging primarily low-income Commonwealth residents for jail calls.

“At the end of the day, who pays for these calls? It’s the families who pay for these calls,” Cabral said. “Many of these families are really struggling to survive and are burdened with huge phone bills.”

The version of the House amendment prohibits charging inmates for jail calls and sets aside a $20 million trust to pay for calls and compensate sheriff’s offices for lost revenue. Cabral said he is confident that whether or not an amendment makes it into the Senate version of the budget, the conference committee will adopt the House version in the final budget bill.

In FY23, New Bedford will receive more than $25 million in unrestricted government assistance for the city budget. Cabral discussed securing specific line items for New Bedford, which included $80,000 for youth programs at Dennison Memorial, $50,000 for opioid abuse treatment at Greater New Bedford Community Health Center , $75,000 for AHA!, $50,000 for programming at Fredrick Douglass House, $25,000 for youth learning at the New Bedford Festival Theatre, $25,000 for new citizenship and labor education for the Immigrants Assistance Center and $50,000 for the Zeiterion Theatre.

Although funding for the Zeiterion has been the subject of some controversy after Mayor Jon Mitchell announced a $5 million ARPA allocation to the theater, Cabral argues that the performing arts center is a significant driver of economic growth and youth outreach in the city.

“It’s the premier performing arts center, not just in New Bedford but for the region,” he said. “It has such a positive impact on the economy as a whole. When you have an event hosted by the Zeiterion or in the summer by the New Bedford Festival theatre, when you go downtown, every seat is booked.”

Cabral also discussed public funding of more than $199,000,000 for New Bedford Public Schools, an increase of $25 million from the prior fiscal year. Cabral said this is the second in a seven-year state commitment to increase funding through the landmark Student Opportunity Act legislation that was signed into state law in 2019.

“It was designed to really help communities like New Bedford,” Cabral said. “It’s not for bricks and mortar. It’s for education. It’s for the classroom. It’s for the curriculum and for the support programs that we need, complementary programs that we might need to meet the needs of a particular student, or a particular family, or a particular group of students.I think we have a great opportunity here to place New Bedford Public Schools at a whole other level.

You can listen to the full interview with Representative Cabral at The Marcus Ferro Show at 4:40 p.m. below:

Massachusetts Laws You Don’t Even Know You’re Breaking

There are plenty of weird laws still in effect in Massachusetts, many of which also come with penalties and fines. While we’re pretty sure no one has been arrested for the crimes we’re about to list, we’re also pretty sure you’ve broken at least one of these laws in the past month. about.

WATCH: What are the main laws passed in the year you were born?

The data in this list was acquired from reliable online sources and media. Read on to find out which major law was passed the year you were born and find out its name, vote count (if any), and its impact and significance.

Live UK policy updates: Johnson’s vote result revealed at 9pm as opposition to PM mounts Mon, 06 Jun 2022 15:25:48 +0000

Nadine Dorries at the Platinum Pageant in London on Sunday. Britain’s Culture Secretary has accused former Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt of trying to ‘destabilize’ the country ©Getty Images

UK Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries has turned on former Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt after calling on fellow Tories to impeach the Prime Minister.

Hunt, who was foreign secretary under former Prime Minister Theresa May, said the Conservative Party was set to lose the next general election if it continued under Boris Johnson.

“We are not giving the British people the leadership they deserve,” he said on Twitter. “We don’t offer the integrity, skill and vision needed to unlock our country’s enormous potential.”

But Dorries, who is a Johnson loyalist, accused Hunt of trying to destabilize the country in order to pursue the top job himself. Hunt lost to Johnson in a leadership contest in 2019.

Tory MPs will decide on Monday night whether to retain Johnson as party leader and prime minister.

“You were wrong about almost everything, you are still wrong now,” she wrote on Twitter.

The Culture Secretary has accused Hunt of failing to prepare for the Covid-19 pandemic when he was Health Secretary under Prime Minister David Cameron.

“Your pandemic preparedness for six years as health secretary was found to be insufficient and inadequate,” she said. “Your duplicity at this time to destabilize the party and the country to serve your own personal ambition, more so.”

The vote of no confidence was orchestrated by a small number of MPs, Dorries told Sky News.

When Jeremy Hunt says it’s time for a change, he means “it’s time for him,” she added.

If Johnson gets a majority of one, “that’s enough to move on,” she said.

It is “utterly bizarre”, she said, that a “small number of MPs can overrule the will of the people”.